AB654, s. 11 23Section 11. 66.1105 (4) (gm) 6. of the statutes is created to read:
AB654,9,2524 66.1105 (4) (gm) 6. Declares that the district is a blighted area district, a
25rehabilitation or conservation district, an industrial district, or a mixed-use district

1based on the identification and classification of the property included within the
2district under par. (c) and subd. 4. a. If the district is not exclusively blighted,
3rehabilitation or conservation, industrial, or mixed use, the declaration under this
4subdivision shall be based on which classification is predominant with regard to the
5area described in subd. 4. a.
AB654, s. 12 6Section 12. 66.1105 (4) (h) 1. of the statutes, as affected by 2003 Wisconsin Act
734
, is amended to read:
AB654,10,238 66.1105 (4) (h) 1. Subject to subds. 2., 3. 4., and 5., the planning commission
9may, by resolution, adopt an amendment to a project plan. The amendment is subject
10to approval by the local legislative body and approval requires the same findings as
11provided in par. pars. (g) and (gm) 4. c. Any amendment to a project plan is also
12subject to review by a joint review board, acting under sub. (4m). Adoption of an
13amendment to a project plan shall be preceded by a public hearing held by the plan
14commission at which interested parties shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity
15to express their views on the amendment. Notice of the hearing shall be published
16as a class 2 notice, under ch. 985. The notice shall include a statement of the purpose
17and cost of the amendment and shall advise that a copy of the amendment will be
18provided on request. Before publication, a copy of the notice shall be sent by 1st class
19mail to the chief executive officer or administrator of all local governmental entities
20having the power to levy taxes on property within the district and to the school board
21of any school district which includes property located within the proposed district.
22For a county with no chief executive officer or administrator, this notice shall be sent
23to the county board chairperson.
AB654, s. 13 24Section 13. 66.1105 (4) (h) 2. of the statutes, as affected by 2003 Wisconsin Act
2534
, is amended to read:
AB654,11,11
166.1105 (4) (h) 2. Except as provided in subds. 3., 4., and 5., not more than once
2during the 7 years after the tax incremental district is created,
the planning
3commission may adopt an amendment to a project plan under subd. 1. to modify the
4district's boundaries, not more than 4 times during the district's existence, by
5subtracting territory from the district in a way that does not remove contiguity from
6the district or by
adding territory to the district that is contiguous to the district and
7that is served by public works or improvements that were created as part of the
8district's project plan. Expenditures for project costs that are incurred because of an
9amendment to a project plan to which this subdivision applies may be made for not
10more than 3 years after the date on which the local legislative body adopts a
11resolution amending the project plan.
AB654, s. 14 12Section 14. 66.1105 (4) (h) 3. of the statutes is repealed.
AB654, s. 15 13Section 15. 66.1105 (4m) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB654,12,1314 66.1105 (4m) (a) Any city that seeks to create a tax incremental district or
15amend a project plan shall convene a temporary joint review board under this
16paragraph, or a standing joint review board under sub. (3) (g),
to review the proposal.
17The Except as provided in par. (am), and subject to par. (ae), the board shall consist
18of one representative chosen by the school district that has power to levy taxes on the
19property within the tax incremental district, one representative chosen by the
20technical college district that has power to levy taxes on the property within the tax
21incremental district, one representative chosen by the county that has power to levy
22taxes on the property within the tax incremental district, one representative chosen
23by the city or, for a tax incremental district created by a county in a town under s.
2459.57 (3), one representative chosen by the town,
and one public member. If more
25than one school district, more than one union high school district, more than one

1elementary school district,
more than one technical college district or more than one
2county has the power to levy taxes on the property within the tax incremental
3district, the unit in which is located property of the tax incremental district that has
4the greatest value shall choose that representative to the board. The public member
5and the board's chairperson shall be selected by a majority of the other board
6members before the public hearing under sub. (4) (a) or (h) 1. is held. All board
7members shall be appointed and the first board meeting held within 14 days after
8the notice is published under sub. (4) (a) or (h) 1. Additional meetings of the board
9shall be held upon the call of any member. The city that seeks to create the tax
10incremental district or to amend its project plan shall provide administrative
11support for the board. By majority vote, the board may disband following approval
12or rejection of the proposal, unless the board is a standing board that is created by
13the city under sub. (3) (g)
.
AB654, s. 16 14Section 16. 66.1105 (4m) (ae) of the statutes is created to read:
AB654,12,1915 66.1105 (4m) (ae) 1. A representative chosen by a school district under par. (a)
16or (am) shall be the president of the school board, or his or her designee. If the school
17board president appoints a designee, he or she shall give preference to the school
18district's finance director or another person with knowledge of local government
19finances.
AB654,12,2420 2. The representative chosen by the county under par. (a) shall be the county
21executive or, if the county does not have a county executive, the chairperson of the
22county board, or the executive's or chairperson's designee. If the county executive or
23county board chairperson appoints a designee, he or she shall give preference to the
24county treasurer or another person with knowledge of local government finances.
AB654,13,5
13. The representative chosen by the city under par. (a) shall be the mayor, or
2city manager, or his or her designee. If the mayor or city manager appoints a
3designee, he or she shall give preference to the person in charge of administering the
4city's economic development programs, the city treasurer, or another person with
5knowledge of local government finances.
AB654,13,96 4. The representative chosen by the technical college district under par. (a)
7shall be the district's director or his or her designee. If the technical college district's
8director appoints a designee, he or she shall give preference to the district's chief
9financial officer or another person with knowledge of local government finances.
AB654,13,1310 5. If a county creates a tax incremental district as authorized under s. 59.57 (3),
11the joint review board for that district shall have an additional representative who
12shall be chosen by the city or village which has the longest contiguous border with
13the town.
AB654, s. 17 14Section 17. 66.1105 (4m) (am) of the statutes is created to read:
AB654,13,2215 66.1105 (4m) (am) If a city seeks to create a tax incremental district that is
16located in a union high school district, the seat that is described under par. (a) for the
17school district representative to the board shall be held by 2 representatives, each
18of whom has one-half of a vote. Subject to par. (ae), one representative shall be
19chosen by the union high school district that has the power to levy taxes on the
20property within the tax incremental district and one representative shall be chosen
21by the elementary school district that has the power to levy taxes on the property
22within the tax incremental district.
AB654, s. 18 23Section 18. 66.1105 (4m) (b) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB654,14,624 66.1105 (4m) (b) 2. Except as provided in subd. 2m., no tax incremental district
25may be created and no project plan may be amended unless the board approves the

1resolution adopted under sub. (4) (gm) or (h) 1. by a majority vote not less than 10
2days nor more than
within 30 days after receiving the resolution. The board may not
3approve the resolution under this subdivision unless the board's approval contains
4a positive assertion that, in its judgment, the development described in the
5documents the board has reviewed under subd. 1. would not occur without the
6creation of a tax incremental district.
AB654, s. 19 7Section 19. 66.1105 (4m) (b) 2m. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB654,14,148 66.1105 (4m) (b) 2m. The requirement under subd. 2. that a vote by the board
9take place not less than 10 days nor more than within 30 days after receiving a
10resolution does not apply to a resolution amending a project plan under sub. (4) (h)
111. if the resolution relates to a tax incremental district, the application for the
12redetermination of the tax incremental base of which was made in 1998, that is
13located in a village that was incorporated in 1912, has a population of at least 3,800
14and is located in a county with a population of at least 108,000.
AB654, s. 20 15Section 20. 66.1105 (4m) (b) 4. of the statutes is created to read:
AB654,14,1916 66.1105 (4m) (b) 4. The board shall notify prospectively the governing body of
17every local governmental unit that is not represented on the board, and that has
18power to levy taxes on the property within the tax incremental district, of meetings
19of the board and of the agendas of each meeting for which notification is given.
AB654, s. 21 20Section 21. 66.1105 (5) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB654,14,2321 66.1105 (5) (a) Upon Subject to sub. (8) (d), upon the creation of a tax
22incremental district or upon adoption of any amendment subject to par. (c), its tax
23incremental base shall be determined as soon as reasonably possible.
AB654, s. 22 24Section 22. 66.1105 (5) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB654,15,15
166.1105 (5) (b) Upon application in writing by the city clerk, in a form
2prescribed by the department of revenue, the department shall determine according
3to its best judgment from all sources available to it the full aggregate value of the
4taxable property and, except as provided in par. (bm), of the city-owned property in
5the tax incremental district. The application shall state the percentage of territory
6within the tax incremental district which the local legislative body estimates will be
7devoted to retail business at the end of the maximum expenditure period specified
8in sub. (6) (am) 1. if that estimate is at least 35 percent. Subject to sub. (8) (d), the

9department shall certify this aggregate valuation to the city clerk, and the aggregate
10valuation constitutes the tax incremental base of the tax incremental district. The
11city clerk shall complete these forms, including forms for the amendment of a project
12plan,
and submit the application or amendment forms on or before December 31 of
13the year the tax incremental district is created, as defined in sub. (4) (gm) 2. or, in
14the case of an amendment, on or before December 31 of the year in which the changes
15to the project plan take effect.
AB654, s. 23 16Section 23. 66.1105 (5) (c) of the statutes, as affected by 2003 Wisconsin Act
1734
, is amended to read:
AB654,16,1018 66.1105 (5) (c) If the city adopts an amendment to the original project plan for
19any district which subtracts territory from the district or which includes additional
20project costs at least part of which will be incurred after the period specified in sub.
21(6) (am) 1., the tax incremental base for the district shall be redetermined, if sub. (4)
22(h) 2., 3., 4., or 5. applies to the amended project plan, either by subtracting from the
23tax incremental base the value of the taxable property that is subtracted from the
24existing district or by
adding to the tax incremental base the value of the taxable
25property and the value of real property owned by the city, other than property

1described in par. (bm),
that is added to the existing district under sub. (4) (h) 2., 3.,
24., or 5. or, if sub. (4) (h) 2., 3., 4., or 5. does not apply to the amended project plan,
3under par. (b), as of the January 1 next preceding the effective date of the amendment
4if the amendment becomes effective between January 2 and September 30, as of the
5next subsequent January 1 if the amendment becomes effective between October 1
6and December 31 and if the effective date of the amendment is January 1 of any year,
7the redetermination shall be made on that date. The With regard to a district to
8which territory has been added, the
tax incremental base as redetermined under this
9paragraph is effective for the purposes of this section only if it exceeds the original
10tax incremental base determined under par. (b).
AB654, s. 24 11Section 24. 66.1105 (5) (ce) of the statutes, as affected by 2003 Wisconsin Act
1234
, is amended to read:
AB654,17,213 66.1105 (5) (ce) If the city adopts an amendment, to which sub. (4) (h) 2., 3., 4.,
14or 5. applies, the tax incremental base for the district shall be redetermined, either
15by subtracting from the tax incremental base the value of the taxable property that
16is subtracted from the existing district or by
adding to the tax incremental base the
17value of the taxable property and the value of real property owned by the city, other
18than property described in par. (bm),
that is added to the existing district under sub.
19(4) (h) 2., 3., 4., or 5., as of the January 1 next preceding the effective date of the
20amendment if the amendment becomes effective between January 2 and
21September 30, as of the next subsequent January 1 if the amendment becomes
22effective between October 1 and December 31 and if the effective date of the
23amendment is January 1 of any year, the redetermination shall be made on that date.
24The With regard to a district to which territory has been added, the tax incremental

1base as redetermined under this paragraph is effective for the purposes of this
2section only if it exceeds the original tax incremental base determined under par. (b).
AB654, s. 25 3Section 25. 66.1105 (5) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB654,17,124 66.1105 (5) (d) The department of revenue may not certify the tax incremental
5base as provided in par. (b) until it determines that each of the procedures and
6documents required by sub. (4) (a), (b), (gm) or (h) and par. (b) has been timely
7completed and all notices required under sub. (4) (a), (b), (gm) or (h) timely given.
8The facts supporting any document adopted or action taken to comply with sub. (4)
9(a), (b), (gm) or (h) are not subject to review by the department of revenue under this
10paragraph, except that the department may not certify the tax incremental base as
11provided in par. (b) until it reviews and approves of the findings that are described
12in sub. (4) (gm) 4. c
.
AB654, s. 26 13Section 26. 66.1105 (6) (a) 3. of the statutes, as affected by 2003 Wisconsin Acts
1434
and 46, is repealed.
AB654, s. 27 15Section 27. 66.1105 (6) (a) 4. of the statutes, as affected by 2003 Wisconsin Acts
1634
and 46, is amended to read:
AB654,17,1917 66.1105 (6) (a) 4. Twenty-three years after the tax incremental district is
18created if the district is created after September 30, 1995, and before October 1,
192004
.
AB654, s. 28 20Section 28. 66.1105 (6) (a) 7. of the statutes is created to read:
AB654,17,2421 66.1105 (6) (a) 7. Twenty years after the tax incremental district is created if
22the district is created on or after the effective date of this subdivision .... [revisor
23inserts date], and if the district is at least predominantly suitable for mixed-use
24development or industrial sites under sub. (4) (gm) 6.
AB654, s. 29 25Section 29. 66.1105 (6) (a) 8. of the statutes is created to read:
AB654,18,4
166.1105 (6) (a) 8. Twenty-seven years after the tax incremental district is
2created if the district is created on or after the effective date of this subdivision ....
3[revisor inserts date], and if the district is a district specified under sub. (4) (gm) 6.
4other than a district specified under subd. 7.
AB654, s. 30 5Section 30. 66.1105 (6) (am) 1. of the statutes, as affected by 2003 Wisconsin
6Act 34
, is repealed and recreated to read:
AB654,18,97 66.1105 (6) (am) 1. Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, no
8expenditure may be made later than 2 years before the unextended termination date
9of a tax incremental district under sub. (7) (am).
AB654, s. 31 10Section 31. 66.1105 (6) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB654,19,511 66.1105 (6) (c) Except for tax increments allocated under par. (d), (dm) or, (e),
12or (f) all tax increments received with respect to a tax incremental district shall, upon
13receipt by the city treasurer, be deposited into a special fund for that district. The
14city treasurer may deposit additional moneys into such fund pursuant to an
15appropriation by the common council. No moneys may be paid out of such fund
16except to pay project costs with respect to that district, to reimburse the city for such
17payments, to pay project costs of a district under par. (d), (dm) or (e) or to satisfy
18claims of holders of bonds or notes issued with respect to such district. Subject to par.
19(d), (dm) or (e), moneys paid out of the fund to pay project costs with respect to a
20district may be paid out before or after the district is terminated under sub. (7).
21Subject to any agreement with bondholders, moneys in the fund may be temporarily
22invested in the same manner as other city funds if any investment earnings are
23applied to reduce project costs. After all project costs and all bonds and notes with
24respect to the district have been paid or the payment thereof provided for, subject to
25any agreement with bondholders, if there remain in the fund any moneys that are

1not allocated under par. (d), (dm) or (e), they shall be paid over to the treasurer of each
2county, school district or other tax levying municipality or to the general fund of the
3city in the amounts that belong to each respectively, having due regard for that
4portion of the moneys, if any, that represents tax increments not allocated to the city
5and that portion, if any, that represents voluntary deposits of the city into the fund.
AB654, s. 32 6Section 32. 66.1105 (6) (e) 1. d. of the statutes is created to read:
AB654,19,117 66.1105 (6) (e) 1. d. The donor tax incremental district is able to demonstrate,
8based on the positive tax increments that are currently generated, that it has
9sufficient revenues to pay for all project costs that have been incurred under the
10project plan for that district and sufficient surplus revenues to pay for some of the
11eligible costs of the recipient tax incremental district.
AB654, s. 33 12Section 33. 66.1105 (6) (e) 2. of the statutes is repealed.
AB654, s. 34 13Section 34. 66.1105 (6) (f) of the statutes is created to read:
AB654,19,1814 66.1105 (6) (f) 1. Not later than the date on which a tax incremental district
15terminates under sub. (7) (am), a planning commission may amend under sub. (4) (h)
16the project plan of a tax incremental district to allocate positive tax increments
17generated by that tax incremental district to another tax incremental district
18created by that planning commission if all of the following conditions are met:
AB654,19,2119 a. The donor tax incremental district, the positive tax increments of which are
20to be allocated, and the recipient tax incremental district have the same overlying
21taxing jurisdictions.
AB654,19,2322 b. The allocation of tax increments under this paragraph is approved by the
23joint review board.
AB654,19,2524 2. An allocation of tax increments under this paragraph may be used by the
25recipient district only if one of the following applies:
AB654,20,2
1a. The project costs in the recipient district are used to create, provide, or
2rehabilitate low-cost housing or to remediate environmental contamination.
AB654,20,53 b. The recipient district was created upon a finding that not less than 50
4percent, by area, of the real property within the district is blighted or in need of
5rehabilitation.
AB654,20,86 3. The allocation of positive tax increments from a donor district to one or more
7recipient districts cannot be made unless the donor district has first satisfied all of
8its current-year debt service and project cost obligations.
AB654,20,109 4. No city may request or receive under sub. (7) (am) 2. an extension for the life
10of a donor tax incremental district.
AB654, s. 35 11Section 35. 66.1105 (7) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB654,20,1812 66.1105 (7) (a) That time when the city has received aggregate tax increments
13with respect to the district in an amount equal to the aggregate of all project costs
14under the project plan and any amendments to the project plan for the district, except
15that this paragraph does not apply to a district whose positive tax increments have
16been allocated under sub. (6) (d), (dm) or, (e), or (f) until the district to which the
17allocation is made has paid off the aggregate of all of its project costs under its project
18plan.
AB654, s. 36 19Section 36. 66.1105 (7) (am) of the statutes, as affected by 2003 Wisconsin Act
2046
, is repealed and recreated to read:
AB654,20,2421 66.1105 (7) (am) 1. For a district about which a finding is made under sub. (4)
22(gm) 4. a. that not less than 50 percent, by area, of the real property within the district
23is a blighted area or in need of rehabilitation or conservation work, 27 years after the
24district is created.
AB654,21,14
12. For a district about which a finding is made under sub. (4) (gm) 4. a. that not
2less than 50 percent, by area, of the real property within the district is suitable for
3industrial sites or mixed-use development, 20 years after the district is created,
4except that during the 18th year of such a district's existence, the city that created
5the district may request that the joint review board extend the life of the district for
6an additional 5 years. Along with its request for a 5-year extension, the city may
7provide the joint review board with an independent audit that demonstrates that the
8district is unable to pay off its project costs within the 20 years after the district is
9created. The joint review board may deny or approve a request to extend the life of
10the district for 5 years if the request does not include the independent audit, and the
11board shall approve a request to extend the life of the district for 5 years if the request
12includes the audit. If the joint review board extends the district's life, the district
13shall terminate at the earlier of the end of the extended period or the period specified
14in par. (a).
AB654, s. 37 15Section 37. 66.1105 (7) (ar) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB654,21,1916 66.1105 (7) (ar) Notwithstanding par. (am), 22 35 years after the last
17expenditure identified in the project plan is made if the
district to which the plan
18relates
is created if it was created before October 1, 1995, and if the project plan is
19amended under sub. (4) (h) 3. or 4.
AB654, s. 38 20Section 38. 66.1105 (8) (title) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB654,21,2121 66.1105 (8) (title) Notice of district termination, reporting requirements.
AB654, s. 39 22Section 39. 66.1105 (8) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB654,21,2523 66.1105 (8) (a) A city which creates a tax incremental district under this section
24shall give the department of revenue written notice within 10 60 days of the
25termination of the tax incremental district under sub. (7).
AB654, s. 40
1Section 40. 66.1105 (8) (c) of the statutes is created to read:
AB654,22,52 66.1105 (8) (c) After a city transmits to the department of revenue the notice
3required under par. (a) the city and the department shall agree on a date by which
4the city shall send to the department, on a form prescribed by the department, all of
5the following information that relates to the terminated tax incremental district:
AB654,22,66 1. A final accounting of all expenditures made by the city.
AB654,22,77 2. The total amount of project costs incurred by the city.
AB654,22,88 3. The total amount of positive tax increments received by a city.
AB654,22,109 4. The total amount of project costs, if any, not paid for with tax increments that
10became obligations of the city after the district was terminated.
AB654, s. 41 11Section 41. 66.1105 (8) (d) of the statutes is created to read:
AB654,22,1612 66.1105 (8) (d) If a city does not send to the department of revenue the form
13specified in par. (c) within the time limit agreed to by the city and the department
14under par. (c), the department may not certify the tax incremental base of a tax
15incremental district under sub. (5) (a) and (b) until the form is sent to the
16department.
AB654, s. 42 17Section 42. 66.1105 (15) of the statutes is created to read:
AB654,23,518 66.1105 (15) Substantial compliance. Substantial compliance with subs. (3),
19(4) (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), and (h), (4m), and (5) (b) by a city that creates, or attempts
20to create, a tax incremental district is sufficient to give effect to any proceedings
21conducted under this section if, in the opinion of the department of revenue, any
22error, irregularity, or informality that exists in the city's attempts to comply with
23subs. (3), (4) (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), and (h), (4m), and (5) (b) does not affect substantial
24justice. If the department of revenue determines that a city has substantially
25complied with subs. (3), (4) (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), and (h), (4m), and (5) (b), the

1department of revenue shall determine the tax incremental base of the district,
2allocate tax increments, and treat the district in all other respects as if the
3requirements under subs. (3), (4) (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), and (h), (4m), and (5) (b) had
4been strictly complied with based on the date that the resolution described under
5sub. (4) (gm) 2. is adopted.
AB654, s. 43 6Section 43. 66.1106 (13) of the statutes is created to read:
AB654,23,167 66.1106 (13) Payment of eligible costs for annexed territory,
8redetermination of tax incremental base.
If a city or village annexes territory from
9a town and if the town is using an environmental remediation tax increment to
10remediate environmental pollution on all or part of the territory that is annexed, the
11city or village shall pay to the town that portion of the eligible costs that are
12attributable to the annexed territory. The city or village, and the town, shall
13negotiate an agreement on the amount that must be paid under this subsection. The
14department shall redetermine the environmental tax incremental base of any parcel
15of real property for which the environmental remediation tax incremental base was
16determined under sub. (4) if part of that parcel is annexed under this subsection.
AB654, s. 44 17Section 44. Laws of 1975, chapter 105, section 1 (1) and (2) are amended to
18read:
AB654,24,519 [Laws of 1975, chapter 105] Section 1 (1) The legislature finds that the existing
20system of allocating aggregate property tax revenues among tax levying
21municipalities has resulted in significant inequities and disincentives. The cost of
22public works or improvements within a city or, village, or county has been borne
23entirely by the city or, village, or county while the expansion of tax base which is
24stimulated, directly or indirectly, by such improvements, benefits not only the city
25or, village, or county but also all municipalities which share such tax base. This

1situation is inequitable. Moreover, when the cost to a city or, village, or county of a
2public improvement project exceeds the future benefit to the city or, village, or county
3resulting therefrom, the city or, village , or county may decide not to undertake such
4project. This situation has resulted in the postponement or cancellation of socially
5desirable projects.
AB654,24,116 (2) The legislature further finds that accomplishment of the vital and beneficial
7public purposes of sections 66.405 to 66.425, 66.43, 66.431, 66.435 and 66.52 of the
8statutes, is being frustrated because of a lack of incentives and financial resources.
9The purpose of this act is to create a viable procedure by which a city or, village, or
10county
, through its own initiative and efforts, may finance projects which will tend
11to accomplish these laudable objectives.
AB654, s. 45 12Section 45. Initial applicability.
AB654,24,1513 (1) Except as provided in subsections (2) and (3), this act first applies to a tax
14incremental district that is in existence on the effective date of this subsection or that
15is created on the effective date of this subsection.
AB654,24,2016 (2) Except as provided in subsection (3 ), the treatment of section 66.1105 (2) (f)
171. i. and 2. d., (4) (e) and (gm) 1. and 6., (4m) (a), (ae), (am), and (b) 2., 2m., and 4.,
18(5) (a), (b), (c), and (ce), (6) (a) 4., 7., and 8., and (e) 1. d. and 2., (7) (a), (am), and (ar),
19and (8) (title), (a), (c), and (d) of the statutes, first applies to a tax incremental district
20that is created on October 1, 2004.
AB654,24,2421 (3) The treatment of section 66.1105 (2) (f) 1. i. and 2. d., (4) (gm) 1. and (h) 2.,
22(4m) (b) 2., (5) (b), (c), and (ce), and (6) (e) 1. d. of the statutes first applies to the
23amendment of a tax incremental district's project plan that takes effect on October
241, 2004.
AB654, s. 46
1Section 46. Effective dates. This act takes effect on the first day of the 4th
2month beginning after publication, except as follows:
AB654,25,7 3(1) The treatment of sections 59.57 (3) and 66.1105 (2) (f) 1. i. and 2. d., (3) (g),
4(4) (e), (gm) 1., 4. a. and c., and 6., and (h) 2., (4m) (a), (am), (b) 2., 2m., and 4., (5) (a),
5(b), (c), and (ce), (6) (a) 3., 4., 7., and 8., (am) 1., and (e) 1. d. and 2., (7) (am), and (ar),
6and (8) (title), (c), and (d) of the statutes takes effect on October 1, 2004, or on the day
7after publication, whichever is later.
AB654,25,88 (End)
Loading...
Loading...